Praise for My Books


"Manreet Sodhi Someshwar is a gifted writer of great promise. I have a gut feeling we have a new star rising in Punjab's literary horizon. She has an excellent command of English and a sly sense of humour."
- Khushwant Singh on The Long Walk Home

"An enjoyable tale of a sassy girl's headlong race up the corporate ladder."
- India Today on Earning the Laundry Stripes


Friday, 24 February 2012

Is This the Fate of the Taj Mahal?

The fifth phase of UP assembly elections 2012 is underway and Mayawati cannot be far from the mind, right? While her statues might have been veiled, what if the Dalit Queen fired a salvo which was totally unmissable?

Like below?!



Facts to chew over:

Cost of construction of Taj Mahal: USD 500 million (present value)

Cost of construction of Mayawati's statues: USD 400 million between 2007-2009, plus
                                                                     USD 500 million planned on future memorials

Take away:

Tucked inside those statues of elephants, Bagwati and Kanshi Ram are two Taj Mahals, at least! Howzzat?



Join the debate now, and have your say, at


Wednesday, 22 February 2012

Review: Behind the Beautiful Forevers by Katherine Boo



I reviewed Behind the Beautiful Forevers for the South China Morning Post of Sunday, 19 February 2012.

In 2011 middle class India was in the throes of an anti-corruption movement headed by a Gandhian leader called Anna Hazare who was pressing for a stronger Jan Lokpal Bill, a People’s Ombudsman Bill. The movement against corruption stirred a middle class noted for its political apathy and blew like a whirlwind across the nation, gathering in its sweep social activists, Bollywood celebrities, and media people. 

As the mass agitation spread Hazare went on several fasts, using a tool Mahatma Gandhi had deftly deployed against the British during India’s freedom struggle – his topi, Gandhi cap, became a fashion statement as his supporters chanted ‘I am Anna’. 

Around the time of the first indefinite fast in Delhi Katherine Boo, an American journalist, was wrapping up three years of reportage from a Mumbai slum called Annawadi that nestled cheek-by-jowl with the international airport. From November 2007 Boo had documented the experiences of residents with written notes, video recordings, audiotapes, and more than three thousand public records – these obtained by diligent petitioning of government agencies under the RTI (Right To Information) act. 

The energetic and vociferous support that Hazare and his team galvanized took the Government by surprise. Corruption is endemic in India and Indians of all classes survive by giving and taking bribes. What had changed? 

Boo, though, wasn’t surprised. After her marriage to Sunil Khilnani, an Indian academician, she’d visited India, “an increasingly affluent nation that still housed one-third of the poverty, and one-quarter of the hunger, on the planet”. For years, she’d reported on the poor communities in the United States and in India, parallel questions had surfaced: what does it take to get out of poverty?

Thereafter, the Pulitzer prize-winning New Yorker staffer spent months at a stretch in boggy Annawadi where three thousand people were packd into 335 huts, as she sought to answer how ordinary low-income people – particularly women and children – negotiate the age of global markets. “What is the infrastructure of opportunity in this society? Whose capabilities are given wing by the market and a government’s social and economic policy? Whose capabilities are squandered?” 

India’s growth story had brought in its wake a frothy mélange: an increasingly affluent middle class, an intrusive media, migration from rural areas to the metropolises, and corruption scandals centred on perfidious politicians. Predictably, the affluent middle class, aided by a sensationalist media, stiffened its spine, found its voice and nailed corruption on self-serving politicos.

But while the pursuit of opportunity had aided the middle class, it had also exacerbated the existing inequalities. Behind the runaway success of Slumdog Millionaire, a British film about a young man from Dharavi slums of Mumbai who beats all odds to become fabulously wealthy, lay the reality of slums juxtaposed with luxury hotels, high rises with dumpsters, all of which emphasized the disparity between the rich and poor residents of the Indian financial capital, alternatively known as Slumbai. 

The title, Behind the Beautiful Forevers, derives from an advertisement for Italiante floor tiles on a concrete wall that barricaded Airport Road from the slum of Annawadi. The corporate slogan ran the wall’s length: BEAUTIFUL FOREVER BEAUTIFUL FOREVER.

The profound inequality reminded Boo of other modern cities. “The scholars who map levels of disparity between wealthy and impoverished citizens consider New York and Washington D.C., almost as unequal as Nairobi and Santiago. Why don’t more of our unequal societies implode?”

How did Boo – a blond Caucasian woman, unfamiliar with India or its languages – chronicle the lives of the Annawadians? With the help of translators and by compensating for her limitations “the same way I do in unfamiliar American territory: by time spent, attention paid, documentation secured, accounts cross-checked”. The white woman circus fell away in a couple of months as “residents had concerns more pressing than my presence”.

For a piece of first-class reportage, the book is written at the pace of a thriller, rocketing off with a scene of self-immolation triggered by a squabble between neighbours. However, it contains no rags-to-riches story, no dramatic flashpoints, and no Bollywood superstar strolls into the slum (as in Slumdog Millionaire). Taking us into the lives and daily struggles of three Annawadians – Abdul Husain, the garbage sorter; Asha the aspiring slumlord-cum-kindergarten teacher; Manju, who wants to be the first graduate from Annawadi – this narrative non-fiction engages with an intimate eye and abundant humanity.

There is a reason Boo chose these three protagonists. As every slumdweller knew, there were three main ways out of poverty: finding an entrepreneurial niche, as the Husains had found in garbage; politics and corruption, in which Asha placed her hopes; and education, which Manju cleaved to.


The teenaged Abdul is the oldest child in the Husain family and its primary breadwinner. A garbage trader who bought from the scavengers, his profit came from selling refuse to small recycling plants. His mantra is to avoid trouble, stay quiet, and work hard to make enough money to buy a plot of land away from Annawadi. Yet, an envious neighbour implicates him in murder that sends the unworldly man-boy hurtling through the hoops of police-jail-court. “The Indian criminal justice system was a market like garbage, Abdul now understood. Innocence and guilt could be bought and sold like a kilo of polyurethane bags”. 

Asha, who migrated to Mumbai when she married, truly grasps the opportunities of a globalizing economy where the wealthy blamed the slumdwellers for making the city filthy, even as the oversupply of labour kept the wages of their servants low; and the poor complained about the inequality and the boundaries erected by the wealthy to prevent them from sharing in the new profit. “This development increased the demand for canny mediators – human shock absorbers for the colliding, narrowly construed interests of one of the world’s largest cities”. As a slumlord Asha would become one of those mediators.

Her daughter Manju looks at education as the vehicle that’ll assist her in a migration different from that of her mother – that of class. She “by-hearts” her English classics, imagining herself as the heroine, even as her mother urges her to shed her slum ways as she’d shed her village ones. “Study the first-class people. You see how they’re living, how they walk, what they do. And then you do the same”.

At the narrative’s end, Annawadians face the prospect of their slum’s destruction to pave way for an airport extension. Meanwhile, businessmen and politicians start a scramble to buy up the huts in order to benefit from the promised rehabilitation. The slumdwellers are angry, confused, unsure, yet, they “rarely got mad together. In the age of global market capitalism, hopes and grievances were narrowly conceived, which blunted a sense of common predicament”. 

Boo offers no neat solutions, believing that very little journalism is world-changing. “But if change is to happen it will be because people with power have a better sense of what’s happening to people who have none”.

Behind the Beautiful Forevers is a wonderful feat. It should be compulsory reading for all those descending upon the shores of Shining India as they seek to partake in the country’s growth story. And for middle class India that rallied to the anti-corruption cause of Hazare – it’d be good for them to realize that “for the poor of a country where corruption thieved a great deal of opportunity, corruption was one of the genuine opportunities that remained”.   

There is a video of a panel discussion at the 2012 Jaipur Literature Festival with Katherine Boo that I'd recommend. The link is here.

Wednesday, 15 February 2012

War Horse, and How an Unlikely Story is Born



Last Friday my daughter and I watched War Horse. War Horse is a film adaptation of the beloved children’s classic by Michael Morpurgo. The novel was published in 1982 and has since been the subject of a successful stage adaptation, a radio adaptation broadcast on BBC and recently Steven Spielberg gave it its Hollywood makeover. 

My husband was travelling - which was convenient since, while he has nothing against animals, he probably wouldn’t devote 146 mins of his life watching a film with an equine hero. M and I were more than content to do just that. Let’s just say we have a thing for animals, which that lovely hymn captures well:

All things bright and beautiful,
All creatures great and small,
All things wise and wonderful,
The Lord God made them all.

Besides, M has been horse riding for close to four years now and the best part of it for her is that she gets to talk to the animals, feed them and gaze with adoring eyes as they pick a carrot cube with slobbery lips or knock the ground with impatient hoofs or prick their ears as they listen. 

What I have learnt is that each horse is different - not just in looks but in temperament - and, if you spend time in their company, you learn to converse with them.

Set at the outbreak of World War I, War Horse is the story of Joey, young Albert’s horse, who is bought by the British cavalry and sent off to France to fight while a distraught Albert, too young to enlist in the army, is left behind. However, when Albert gets the news that Joey’s rider, Captain Nicholls was killed in battle, he embarks on a mission to locate Joey and bring him home.

War Horse, the novel, is a war story that highlights the tribulations of war - the heart of the story, however, is the bond between man and animal. It is this heart that Spielberg has taken and and embellished in his film. 

If you’ve never loved an animal like a dear dear friend, then this movie is not for you - your money might be better spent on Clooney in Hawaiin shirts facing midlife crisis, or Brad and baseball or on the lovely ladies in The Help. But if you’ve gazed into an animal’s eyes and sensed a kinship, why then, Joey will take you on a life-affirming journey in the dark as you watch him gallop through gunfire, lug a machine gun uphill through slush, and escape his captors, only to race into a no man’s land where he gets entangled into barbed wire while on either side stand British and German soldiers with their guns ready - will Joey survive?

I am not a film critic but what follows is perhaps one of Spielberg’s finest scenes. A British soldier, defying his superior, approaches Joey with a white flag hoisted in one hand and reaches the trapped horse. As he wonders how to free Joey he senses a figure towering behind him: a German soldier with something menacing gripped in his hand. You’ll need this, the German says, and extends his hand which holds a wire-cutter. 

In a scene that is reminiscent of Saving private Ryan, another worthy feat from Spielberg, two enemies suspend their hostilities and work in tandem to free a struggling animal. The poignant scene is leavened with humour and Spielberg makes you want to jump out of your seat, throw your arms around the two men and Joey and declare: let’s stop the fighting, shall we?

Well, what more can I say? Joey, who acts better than several heroes, especially in Bollywood, is played through the film by fourteen horses but is mainly essayed by a horse called Finders Key. Hats off to him.

David Thewlis - whom M and I know better as Remus Lupin, of Harry Potter fame - plays a slimy landlord, and Michael Morpurgo, the writer, features fleetingly in a horse auction scene standing next to the landlord at the movie’s beginning.

And finally, a word on Michael Morpurgo himself. He was the third Children’s Laureate, a position awarded in the UK once every two years to a distinguished writer of children’s books. He runs a charity called Farms for City Children where inner city children live and work on rural farms. He tells a very interesting story about a boy who came to the farm and hardly spoke - his teachers warned Morpurgo not to question him as he was a stammerer and would flee in terror. 

Morpurgo followed the instructions and observed that the boy related wonderfully with animals but never spoke to other children or adults. And then, one evening, Morpurgo chanced upon the boy standing by a stable door and talking to a horse. “Talking, talking, talking to the horse. And the horse - Hebe - had her head out, just over the top of the stable, and she was listening... and I knew this was a two way thing”.

Something about the intimacy that Morpurgo witnessed that day between the boy and the horse made Morpurgo believe that he could tell a story about WWI through a horse. And thus was War Horse born.


Wednesday, 8 February 2012

Please, Sir, Thoda Adjust Karo Grave Sey, Yeh Dil Maange More!



When I am asked who my literary influences are I name a triumvirate: Mirza Ghalib, Shakespeare and Charles Dickens. However, it would be more accurate to say that they are my earliest influencers and had the most impact for they impinged upon me in early childhood. Thereafter, I’ve admired and greatly enjoyed several writers but it would be fair to say that I haven’t been able to “shake off the pear and close the dikkan” - as a character in my second novel, The Long Walk Home, says.

Shakespeare and Dickens were part of the English curriculum at our school (a convent run by Keralite nuns) and my eldest sister - ahead by five classes - was riffling through Julius Caesar and Great Expectations when I was lost in a world of numerically named detective clubs - Secret Seven, Famous Five, Five Find-Outers - who had an awesome dog, collated clues over scones with marmalade, and solved mysteries.

 At some point, when Enid Blyton gave me breathing space and my sister felt like reading aloud, the Bard and Charles also impinged upon my consciousness. So I made acquaintance with Philip Pirrip who could only call himself Pip, with young Estella who had no heart, with Miss Havisham who resided with her rotting wedding cake in a ruined mansion, with the escaped convict in shackles who wants to eat Pip’s fat cheeks! 

Oooh! I listened, with terror in my heart and begged my sister to not stop. Of course she did but she continued to indulge me with several readathon sessions where she felt that reading aloud would help her memorize the soliloquy that was a surefire Board exam question or the paragraphs which lent themselves exquisitely to the examiners’ ‘Reference to the Context’ questions. 

So I listened, chronology or context be damned, for the words had me in their fevered grip as Mark Antony exhorted his “Friends, Romans, countrymen”, Miss Havisham trawled Satis House in her wedding dress, a shocked Caesar said "Et tu, Brute?" and fell to his death, Uncle Pumblechook breathed like a fish, a soothsayer warned to “Beware the ides of March!”, Estella married Drummle and broke Pip’s heart, and “it was one of those March days when the sun shines hot and the wind blows cold; when it is summer in the light, and winter in the shade” ...

It kindled a love - for words, books, characters, and compelled me - at a point in my corporate career when I was jaded - to resume a love affair of my own making. A vocation and passion for which I have to thank, in part, the Victorian novelist with wise eyes, balding pate and scraggly beard who wrote the most terrific tomes to ensnare a ten-year-old.

On 7 February 2012, Charles Dickens’ 200th birthday celebrations have been galore. Google’s doodle featured some of Dickens most popular characters including Scrooge and Pip; Prince Charles led the celebrations in UK; and bells rang out over London as fans gathered to mark his bicentennial.

And rightly so! Dickens is hailed as the father of the novel and the magic of his words stays strong. If you haven’t read him, for whatever inexcusable reason you might profess, may I suggest your initiation with either of Great Expectations or A Tale of Two Cities? You’re lucky, you know!

As for me, on his 200th birthday, what I wish to say to Charles Dickens really is, “Please, sir, I want some more” - my need is as great as Oliver's. Perhaps some jugaad in good ole Desi fashion might yield results: Please sir, thoda adjust karo grave sey, yeh dil maange more!



Wednesday, 1 February 2012

Should we let the Taj Mahal collapse? Join the debate now!



Like the Abu Simbel temples of Egypt, should Taj Mahal be physically relocated in order to save it?